Home| Postal News | Your Rights | PostalMall | Commentary |  Resources |  Links About  |   Sitemap | Search| Letters to Editor


Related Links:

-Class Action vs USPS: Join Class action suit
 



.

Class Action Overtime Suit Update: On August 26, 2004, the District Court dismissed allegations against USPS of violating the RICO Act and Privacy Act  from the overtime suit. The only allegation remaining in suit is violation of Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Also, a new attorney has been added to handle the case.
District Court Denies USPS Request to Dismiss Portions of Postal Workers' Overtime Suit -USPS sought to dismiss allegations of violating the RICO Act and Privacy Act. Judge:  "..the motion to Dismiss is denied." "ORDER granting motion to schedule preliminary pretrial conference and set time for determination of class action. The Court requests U.S. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins to schedule a preliminary pretrial conference on or after 8/1/04." (7/17/04)

USPS Seeks Dismissal of Postal Workers' Overtime Lawsuit - USPS has petitioned the District Court to dismiss a lawsuit that accuses postal officials of intentionally deleting parts of employees' Time Records to Avoid Paying Overtime. The suit alleges USPS violated the RICO, Privacy and FLSA Acts. However, USPS argues, " The Postal Service is not Subject to RICO Liability As Part of the Federal Government; and  "Postal Service Officials Cannot Be Held Criminally Liable for Acts Committed in Their Official Capacity." Donahue vs FBI (pdf) . The petition further states "the Supreme Court  observed ( in USPS vs Flamingo Industries (pdf) ) that while the Postal Reorganization Act of 1971 may have waived the Postal Service's immunity from suit, it...did not strip it of its governmental status." (7/9/04)


USPS Sued for Intentionally Deleting Parts of Employees' Time Records to Avoid Paying OvertimeSuit May Impact 200,000++ USPS Workers Nationwide- In perhaps one of the most significant and far-reaching lawsuits against the United States Postal Service (USPS) in recent times, four postal workers .  (three active and one retired) are alleging the USPS has systematically and purposefully altered their electronic time slips... and... seeped money out of their paychecks The attorney Sam Bearman was first notified of the USPS actions by Lenny Perez and Dean Albrecht (the man behind the re-hab class action settlement (3/22)
 
Press Release Source: Law Offices of Samuel W. Bearman

United States Postal Service Gets 'Special Delivery' of the Lawsuit Kind - Sued for Intentionally Deleting Parts of Employees' Time Records to Avoid Paying Overtime
 

Law Offices of Samuel W. Bearman Files Suit That May Impact 200,000 USPS Workers Nationwide

TAMPA, Fla., March 22 / -- In perhaps one of the most significant and far-reaching lawsuits against the United States Postal Service (USPS) in recent times, four named postal employees (three active and one retired) are alleging the USPS has "systematically and purposefully" altered their electronic time slips ... and ... seeped money out of their paychecks.

But this is not just about four postal workers. The case is also brought as a class action.

As a class action suit, the number of plaintiffs may ultimately increase to over 200,000 nationwide. That is the number of postal workers that may have been affected by the purposeful actions of USPS supervisors in the United States.

The crux of the suit is that Plaintiffs and other employees were paid less than the salary they should have been paid for the work they did on behalf of the USPS. The suit alleges that Defendant's supervisors intentionally made deletions on regular and overtime hours, impacting letter carriers, rural route letter carriers, mail handlers, window clerks, drivers and other employees. This has resulted in a reduced salary to the employees.

The lawsuit, filed on January 30, 2004 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District Court of Florida (Tampa Division), seeks to redress the wrongs caused by various USPS supervisors. In a three-count complaint filed by Attorney Samuel Bearman of Pensacola, Florida, the suit alleges the USPS has violated the following laws:

     1.  The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
     2.  The Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
     3.  The Privacy Act of 1974

Plaintiffs' attorney, Samuel Bearman, believes that "The number of present or past postal workers affected may number in the hundreds of thousands." He adds, "They deserve to get paid for the work they performed."

Bearman was first notified of the USPS actions by Lenny Perez and Dean Albrecht, of the Federal Employees Compensation/EEO Consultants in Clearwater, FL. According to them, some USPS workers may have been paid less than they should have for over four years.

 

Excerpts of the lawsuit filed in US District Court on January 30, 2004

CLASS Allegations

The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated. The class that the Plaintiffs represent is composed of all employees of the United Stated Postal Service who have had deletions made of their regular hours and overtime hours by their supervisors, which has resulted in reduced salary to the employees. These employees include letter carriers, rural route letter carriers, mail handlers, maintenance workers, distribution clerks, window clerks, drivers, and other employees.

The Plaintiffs are informed and believe and, on that basis, allege that the Plaintiff class numbers in excess of 200,000 employees and is so numerous that joinder of all members would be impractical. The exact size of the Plaintiff class and the identity of the members of the class would be ascertainable from the wage and hour records maintained by the United States Postal Service for the employees.

Questions of law and fact common to the Plaintiff class exist that predominate over questions affecting only individuals members, including the following:

a) Whether supervisors of the putative class members have deleted parts of their regular hours and overtime hours worked.

b) Whether the purpose of these deletions was to keep the supervisors within the budgetary constraints and to qualify for bonuses for maintaining budgetary limitations.

c) Whether, as a result of these actions, the employees have not been paid appropriate wages.

d) Whether the Defendant has failed to maintain hour and wage records regarding its employees with accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness in a reasonably necessary manner to assure fairness to the employees.

e) Whether this action by supervisors on behalf of the Defendant is in violation of the Fair Labors Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201, et al, The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S. C., Sec. 1961, et al, and the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5).

Based on the conduct of the Defendant, the Plaintiffs and the other class members seek damages for the unpaid wages, an equal amount representing liquidated damages and as allowed under 29 U.S.C. Sec. 216(b), interest, attorneys' fees and costs under 29 U.S.C.216(b),

Federal Privacy Act

The actions of the Defendant through its agents, violated the rights of the Plaintiffs under the Federal Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C, Sec 552(a)(e), in that the systems of records of the Defendant were known to contain false and inaccurate statements concerning the hours of work of the Plaintiffs, and other class member, in violation of the duty of the Defendant to maintain individually identifiable records concerning the Plaintiffs with accuracy.

As a result of the violations of such rights, the Plaintiffs suffered economic harm, as well as emotional distress. The minimum statutory damages for persons injured by a Privacy Act violation was set by Congress at $1,000.00 per violation. 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(g)(3)(B)

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs ask that this Court permanently enjoin the Defendant from this conduct outlined in this complaint, award damages as indicated in this complaint, award attorneys fees and case expenses as this honorable Court deems appropriate, and requests jury trial .

(source: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida)