|
|
FY 09 Wait Time In Line Scores and Averages
(National and Area) |
|
|
|
|
FY 09 Goal |
Average WTIL (*) |
Average Score (**) |
|
|
|
NATIONAL |
88.00% |
3:05 |
83.76% |
|
|
|
CAPITAL METRO |
|
2:53 |
86.05% |
|
|
|
EASTERN |
|
2:32 |
88.05% |
|
|
|
GREAT LAKES |
|
2:27 |
88.14% |
|
|
|
NORTHEAST |
|
3:16 |
82.51% |
|
|
|
PACIFIC |
|
3:16 |
82.26% |
|
|
|
SOUTHEAST |
|
3:24 |
81.56% |
|
|
|
SOUTHWEST |
|
3:34 |
80.03% |
|
|
|
WESTERN |
|
3:15 |
82.09% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| *This is the average
wait time, across all shops. Shopper begins clock once they
enter the queue line and stops when they are called by the clerk
to the window |
|
|
| |
| ** The average
score for wait time is the percentage of the time the shoppers
were served in 5 minutes or less as per our target. |
|
|
| |
| Note: |
| The Mystery
Shop program is used to measure wait time in line in FY
2009. There are 8,725 Mystery shop office s that got shopped
approximately twice per that were shopped approximately
twice per Quarter, or a Total of 64,972 shops in FY 2009.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Office Wait
Time in Line Averages and Scores by Area and District
FY 09 Wait Time In Line Averages and Scores
By Area and District |
|
Area |
District |
Average
WTIL |
Average
Score |
|
CAPITAL METRO |
MID-CAROLINAS |
2:20 |
90.21% |
|
|
GREENSBORO |
2:30 |
89.94% |
|
|
GREATER SC |
2:44 |
87.52% |
|
|
NORTHERN VIRGINIA |
2:52 |
85.23% |
|
|
BALTIMORE |
3:02 |
83.49% |
|
|
CAPITAL |
3:16 |
82.98% |
|
|
RICHMOND |
3:33 |
81.88% |
|
EASTERN |
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA |
1:55 |
92.35% |
|
|
APPALACHIAN |
2:14 |
91.01% |
|
|
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA |
2:14 |
90.20% |
|
|
KENTUCKIANA |
2:25 |
88.62% |
|
|
SOUTH JERSEY |
2:29 |
88.19% |
|
|
PHILADELPHIA METRO |
2:36 |
87.89% |
|
|
NORTHERN OHIO |
2:37 |
87.30% |
|
|
WESTERN NEW YORK |
2:52 |
86.24% |
|
|
CINCINNATI |
2:54 |
84.72% |
|
|
COLUMBUS |
3:36 |
79.76% |
|
GREAT LAKES |
LAKELAND |
1:58 |
93.04% |
|
|
GREATER MICHIGAN |
1:53 |
92.95% |
|
|
CENTRAL ILLINOIS |
2:19 |
89.41% |
|
|
GREATER INDIANA |
2:16 |
89.29% |
|
|
SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN |
2:25 |
88.14% |
|
|
GATEWAY |
2:18 |
87.86% |
|
|
NORTHERN ILLINOIS |
2:52 |
85.07% |
|
|
DETROIT |
2:47 |
84.20% |
|
|
CHICAGO |
4:35 |
73.65% |
|
NORTHEAST |
NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND |
1:41 |
93.89% |
|
|
GREATER BOSTON |
2:02 |
90.78% |
|
|
SE NEW ENGLAND |
2:11 |
90.72% |
|
|
ALBANY |
2:18 |
90.27% |
|
|
CONNECTICUT VALLEY |
2:17 |
89.59% |
|
|
LONG ISLAND |
2:07 |
89.35% |
|
|
WESTCHESTER |
2:40 |
87.41% |
|
|
NORTHERN NJ |
3:09 |
82.21% |
|
|
NEW YORK |
6:22 |
62.08% |
|
|
TRIBORO |
6:32 |
59.65% |
|
|
CARIBBEAN |
6:58 |
56.24% |
|
PACIFIC |
HONOLULU |
2:35 |
88.75% |
|
|
SAN FRANCISCO |
2:45 |
86.39% |
|
|
SACRAMENTO |
3:08 |
85.07% |
|
|
BAY-VALLEY |
3:10 |
83.56% |
|
|
SANTA ANA |
3:04 |
82.73% |
|
|
SAN DIEGO |
3:37 |
80.00% |
|
|
LOS ANGELES |
3:37 |
78.64% |
|
|
SIERRA COASTAL |
3:39 |
78.58% |
|
SOUTHEAST |
MISSISSIPPI |
2:34 |
88.14% |
|
|
SOUTH GEORGIA |
2:40 |
87.58% |
|
|
ALABAMA |
2:49 |
87.40% |
|
|
TENNESSEE |
2:40 |
86.61% |
|
|
NORTH FLORIDA |
2:52 |
86.13% |
|
|
SUNCOAST |
3:31 |
80.07% |
|
|
ATLANTA |
3:54 |
77.24% |
|
|
SOUTH FLORIDA |
5:09 |
68.15% |
|
SOUTHWEST |
ARKANSAS |
2:19 |
89.47% |
|
|
OKLAHOMA |
2:37 |
86.50% |
|
|
FORT WORTH |
3:14 |
83.56% |
|
|
LOUISIANA |
3:21 |
81.02% |
|
|
DALLAS |
3:27 |
79.93% |
|
|
RIO GRANDE |
3:43 |
79.15% |
|
|
ALBUQUERQUE |
4:08 |
78.58% |
|
|
HOUSTON |
5:11 |
67.09% |
|
WESTERN |
NORTHLAND |
1:51 |
93.00% |
|
|
HAWKEYE |
1:57 |
92.43% |
|
|
BIG SKY |
2:21 |
89.00% |
|
|
CENTRAL PLAINS |
2:32 |
88.05% |
|
|
DAKOTAS |
2:35 |
85.63% |
|
|
MID-AMERICA |
3:01 |
83.61% |
|
|
PORTLAND |
3:13 |
82.55% |
|
|
SALT LAKE CITY |
3:20 |
81.50% |
|
|
COLO./WYOMING |
3:27 |
80.88% |
|
|
SEATTLE |
3:52 |
76.75% |
|
|
NEVADA-SIERRA |
4:43 |
71.78% |
|
|
ARIZONA |
4:56 |
68.76% |
|
|
ALASKA |
5:56 |
61.65% |
|
The New York Metro (NYM) area was dissolved in FY 09. Districts
from this area have been absorbed by either the Northeast (NE) or
the Eastern (EA) area. This report reflects the FY 10 configuration
of districts to areas. Accordingly, WTIL scores for districts of
the former NYM area are listed under thenir new areas and reflected
in the respective NE and EA area aggregate scores. |
Source: PRC, 2/08/2010
|
|
Reporter.com - Copyright © 2001-present -All
Rights Reserved -
Postal Reporter.com is not affiliated with USPS or any other organization.
Postal Reporter provides news, resources and other information for Postal
Workers, Postal Employees and other Postal related communities |