Postal Employees Injured on Duty EEOC Class Action Case
The lawyers in Glover/Albrecht class complaint sought to include Walker case:
“On March 9, 2002, class counsel filed a motion requesting that the Commission add Edmond Walker as a co-class agent in this case. Mr. Walker’s issues included restricting permanent rehabilitation employees’ work hours; including overtime. In considering this issue, the Administrative Judge noted to the parties that if Mr. Walker and his issues were added to the lawsuit the entire class would have to be renoticed. In light of the possible delay and the additional complexity of adding this issue, class counsel withdrew his request to add Mr. Walker as a co-class agent who raised the overtime issue. Class counsel did not abandon this issue. Instead, Mr. Walker filed a separate class complaint which includes the overtime issue.”
Edmond C. Walker, the class agent in the Walker class action, filed a complaint on August 19, 2002. Walker alleged that, since April 2000, the Postal Service discriminated against individuals with disabilities by:
1. Placing disabled individuals in permanent rehabilitation positions without engaging in the interactive process as required by law;
2. Restricting disabled individuals who are placed in permanent rehabilitation [sic] to limited work hours without any medical justification and without consulting the individual with a disability;
3. Fail[ing] to allow individuals with a disability, who have been placed in permanent rehabilitation positions, to work the number of hours determined appropriate by the individual and his/her physician and which are available; and
4. Fail[ing] to allow individuals with a disability, who have been placed in permanent rehabilitation positions, to use assistive devices in the workplace to accommodate their disabilities, including but not limited to, electric scooters, notwithstanding that said assistive devices pose no threat to safety or inconvenient [sic] in the workplace.
This claim has been analyzed to include denial of overtime.
On December 12, 2003, an EEOC Administrative Judge issued a decision concerning the Walker class complaint. The Administrative Judge ordered the Postal Service to “identify all those pending complaints that raise the same issue as the Walker class complaint during the time frame encompassed by the Walker class complaint, January 1, 2000, to the present.” For those complaints that had already been forwarded to an Administrative Judge– AJ ruled that they be placed into abeyance by the Administrative Judge assigned to the case.
source: EEOC via PostalReporter.com



June 8th, 2006 at 12:30 am
Dumping on workers that were injured on the job is not the answer.
June 8th, 2006 at 2:00 am
ok john, what is the answer? we are not dumping “on” them, we are just dumping them. this program is a genious idea and we all hope it works to the fullest!!!
June 9th, 2006 at 8:18 pm
LOL … What was that oath? You will see, the program will cost the PO BIG Money and the Meek WILL come out on top ; )
So keep on hoping. Your an idiot just like the idiot you call a “genious.” Hmmm now how do you spell that? ((ROFLMAO)) For your information that is GENIUS. How typical of management!
OH YEAH! Just a thought … ALL Rehab jobs must also consider other health conditions. When our therapists say “can’t work at all due to chronic pain and PTSD.” Guess what? You read between the lines.
June 11th, 2006 at 1:41 am
I feel for the injured. However, at my office we have 25 mailhandlers and 5 have some type of limitations. This means when someone goes on vacation or takes AL, the full duty have to work OT because of the shortage. One mailhandler made $75,000 (on a $45,000 salary) by working OT. This person did not do one lick of mailhandler work. Outsourcing may not be the answer but the full duty are overworked because of the injured. Send them to another facility of fix the staffing problem!!!!
June 11th, 2006 at 5:15 am
Under Federal Law the Agency (USPS) is committing an unlawful act. Anyone can file with the Merit System Protection Board. You need not be a preference eligible employee. The USPS has lost every case and will continue to do so unless the law is changed. While representing a letter carrier I simply submitted a Motion for Summary Judgement….Granted. I love the Service and those who believe they are so smart…management dummies.
SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!!!!!!!
June 12th, 2006 at 4:29 am
Move them clouds SunUp! You say, “the full duty are overworked because of the injured.”
Your so FULL OF YOURSELF! The OT will never go away; not because of those injured in the line of duty. Quit Boo Hooing. Remember, “We too did OUR SHARE of overtime” … why?
Simple: Management doesn’t hire enough relief workers … PTFs & Casuals. So let’s put the blame where it should go.
You need to be MORE SYMPATHETIC towards the injured. There’s a good chance that it will be YOU oneday.