ASFM-100 Work Awarded Back to Clerk Craft at Trenton P&DC
Effective May 28, 2008, US District Court Judge Joel A. Pisano issued his decision regarding enforcement of the American Postal Workers Union/United States Postal Service pre-arbitration Settlement Agreement, dated October 28, 2005, for AFSM staffing at the Trenton P&DC.
Judge Pisano stated, “The Settlement Agreement provides for the clerk craft to have primary jurisdiction over the positions on the AFSM-100 machines and that, in the event work requires less than six employees to staff the machines, the remaining positions on the machines will be staffed by clerk craft only. Thereby, if there is a ‘reduction in work [,]’ then clerks only operate the machines. Although the Settlement Agreement does not define ‘reduction in work [.]’ the terms of the Agreement do not limit the method by which the reduction in work may occur. That is, the Agreement sets forth a staffing procedure invoked by a ‘reduction in work’ irrespective of how that reduction in work takes place.
In this instance, the modifications to the AFSM-100 resulted in a ‘reduction in work.’ The addition of the AI and ATHS automated features caused ‘a reduction of the AFSM[-]100 operating crew, [a] decrease[] in operation run times, and efficiencies in the preparation activities.’ (Lewis Aff. II Ex. B). As a result, the ‘reduction in work’ caused by enhancements to the AFSM-100 machine trigger the Settlement Agreement’s staffing reduction procedure.
Thus, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the clerks maintain jurisdiction over the stations in the AFSM-100 machines in the Trenton facility, irrespective of the
enhancements. Accordingly, the Court holds that there is no dispute of material fact that the Settlement Agreement covers the dispute of which Trenton Metro now complains-whether clerks or mail handlers have jurisdiction to operate the AFSM-100 machines-and is ‘sufficiently specific as to be capable of implementation.’ Consolidation Coal, supra, 666 F.2d at 810. The Court further holds that the Settlement Agreement is entitled to enforcement.
Pursuant and in accordance with the Judge’s order, the APWU expects immediate staffing of the three FSM 100 machines with the clerk craft.
The APWU will monitor USPS compliance with the Judge’s order and pursue appropriate pay remedies for all work performed by the Mail Handler craft on the AFSM 100’s commencing today.
Bill Lewis, President, APWU Trenton Metro Area Local



June 5th, 2008 at 7:13 am
Kudos , to the stewards that had enough sense to go to grievance when management notified them of the technological changes to be made. As far as the rest of the country shame on you APWU.
June 10th, 2008 at 3:32 am
super kudos for the metro union reps. not afraid to do what they voluteered to do; represent and protect the member. these are extradinary and hard to find representatives, truely dedication to the members. not like southern ct p&dc - let’s make a deal attitude! our union reps don’t challenge management so they can stay in the union office and not to do their bid jobs. trenton metro - heroes. southern ct - cowards.
June 10th, 2008 at 3:46 am
WORK SMARTER, NOT HARDER!!!
why wait 5-10yrs, or never, for arbitration. mirror trenton metro heroes; go directly to court and get the matter solved quickly. win the case, and have usps pay the legal fees. APWU - all aboard !??
June 11th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
MIKE MALONE - INSTEAD OF CRYING, WHY DON’T YOU BECOME A STEWARD? TRY IT OUT BIG MAN.
June 16th, 2008 at 3:22 am
This is a one time isolated event. Occasionally a dumb Manager will enter into a settlement (in this case a Pre Arb Settlement)without checking with their Superiors. That is just what happened here.
Nothing more. Does not and will not apply to any other installations. The Stewards locally should be complemented on their success, but that is tempered with the luck of the draw in having an idiot Manager who would sign the agreement. Also, this won’t matter at all with the deployment of the FSS machines.
June 16th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Yeah your sure right on that one Ben. John and Mike don’t know anything. The USPS did not pay the APWU’s legal bills & the USPS will appeal, and most likely win.
June 24th, 2008 at 6:32 am
Of course they will appeal, but they won’t win, no judge is going to overturn another judges decision!