PRC Recommends Two-Cent Rate Hike, Forever Stamp
Postal Regulatory Commission Also Backs ‘Forever’ Stamp
See PRC Proposed Rates an d Schedules
By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, Associated Press Writer
Say goodbye to those pesky 1- and 2-cent stamps that used to clutter up desks and purses every time the price of mailing a letter went up. A new “forever” stamp — good for mailing a letter no matter how much rates go up — was recommended Monday by the independent Postal Regulatory Commission. The panel also called for a 2-cent increase in first-class rates to 41 cents, a penny less than the post office had sought.
In addition, the changes would sharply scale back the price of heavier letters.
“Adoption of this proposal is good for the Postal Service, postal customers and our postal system,” commission chairman Dan G. Blair said at a briefing.
A forever stamp would not carry a denomination, but would sell for whatever the first-class rate was at the time.
For example, if the 41-cent rate takes effect, forever stamps would sell for 41 cents. If rates later climbed to 45 cents or more, the price of the forever stamp would also go up at the counter or machine, but those purchased before the change would still be valid to mail a letter.
So there would be no need to buy small-denomination stamps to add to envelopes.
Currently, first-class mail costs 39 cents for the first ounce and 24 cents for each additional ounce.
While the first ounce would rise to 41 cents under the proposal, it would cost just 17 cents for each additional ounce.
That means the price of sending a two-ounce letter would actually decrease from 63 cents to 58 cents.
The proposal also recommended a 2-cent boost, to 26 cents, in the cost of mailing a post card, also a penny less than the Postal Service had sought.
Blair said the rate proposals were scaled back because the higher rates the post office proposed would have raised more income than necessary for the service to break even in 2008.
The proposal also suggested changes in a variety of other rates including a 17-cent surcharge on “odd-shaped” mail that cannot be processed using letter-sorting machines.
The matter now goes back to the board of governors of the post office which can accept the recommendations or ask for reconsideration. If accepted, the new rates could take effect as soon as May.
The Postal Service applied for higher rates last May. Since then the commission has received 139 pieces of testimony from 99 witnesses and held 34 days of hearing on the request in developing its recommendations.
Under legislation approved by Congress last year the commission will develop a new, less cumbersome system of raising rates for use in the future, and also has more authority to regulate postal activity.
Postage rates last went up in January 2006.
Postmaster General John E. Potter has pointed out that “the Postal Service is not immune to the cost pressures affecting every household and business in America.”
For example, each penny increase in the price of a gallon of gasoline costs the post office $8 million, and the post office cannot simply add a fuel surcharge to its rates.
—-
From PRC: 



February 26th, 2007 at 1:10 pm
I hope sales of the “Forever” stamp will be restricted to small quantities 30 days or less before a rate increase.
February 26th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
The new rates are going to make it nearly impossible for us to meter a lot of our outgoing mail, since it will be up to the unpredictable and arbitrary decision of a postal clerk whether something counts as a flat or not. Our domestic rates for shipping books and software to our customers are going to go up an average of 15% in postage costs, our international rates are going to go up an average of over 25%, plus we will have to pay someone’s time to wait on line most days at the post office instead of using a postage meter and having our mail picked up. 12 years ago, our postage costs were 1/3 the cost of our products. Now they’re going to be more than the cost of our products for international customers.
February 27th, 2007 at 9:52 am
The increase in Library Mail rates (e.g., for books sent between libraries for interlibrary or interbranch loans) will go up incredibly. For the minimum 1 lb package the increase is about 50 cents. This is a real blow to smaller and rural libraries who depend on Interlibrary Loan for access to more specialized books for their patrons.
February 28th, 2007 at 4:22 am
I think that they should reconsider changing
to a shape based rate. Things work fine now
and if its not broken, don’t fix it.
February 28th, 2007 at 4:28 pm
Postal Customer,
When has a postal clerk ever been able to arbitrarily decide the rate of a piece of mail? In fact, classes of mail, rates and dimensions have always been clearly established by the postal rate commission. I am not doubting your concerns but any postal customer who feels or knows that they are not being charged the appropriate rate, should certainly question any clerk that “arbitrarily” sets any mail rate. It is simply not done where I work, nor can I imagine any post office where this practice is allowed.
Again, I am not doubting that you have experienced such problems, I just hope that you address any situation where you feel that you are being overcharged based upon the whim of any clerk.
March 11th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
Why is the USPIS blocking the truth about the communications response to Katrina? I posted a comment in the first of March of 2007 and it has been deleted. On the day hurricane Katrina struck P&L International was the only way the USPIS could set up communications in the disaster. Our communications trailer was driven to Baton Rouge to fix the problem. The USPIS published a movie about there heroic work and didn’t mention P&L International, Inc. What are they trying to cover up. If you are a journalist please contact me for the full story and the cover up of this agency.
Thank you,
Paul Pazzaglini
P&L International, Inc.
Phone: 704.843.4991
March 20th, 2007 at 9:43 am
[…] PS: Buy your stamps now, well maybe not. There are negotiations about the next price increase and you wouldn’t want to have to buy a bunch of 1 and 2 cent stamps now would you? […]