Postal Rural Carriers Reject Contract!
The February / March 2007 mail count is OFF.
The contract was voted down therefore the count is off.
SUNDAY FEBRUARY 4, 2007 (source: Wisconsin Rural Letter Carriers)
National Officers and fellow rural carriers, as is required by Article XIV, Section 3, of the National Rural Letter Carriers’ Association Constitution and Bylaws this is the official report of the ratification committee for the 2007 proposed National Agreement between the United States Postal Service and the National Rural Letter carrier’s Association.
Through the entire ratification process each member of this committee fully realized the importance of their task. All functions of the process were carried out with diligence and adherence to Federal Law as well as the provisions set forth in NRLCA Constitution and Bylaws. At no time during this entire assignment was the integrity of any person’s right to privacy jeopardized. All members participated equally at each step of the certification process. Decisions were made impartially and in keeping with the democratic process.
Our first function was to obtain the ballots from the designated post office. All committee were present at the time of acceptance. We were given an opportunity to view the PO Box area and its surroundings. A final sweep of any undeliverable ballots was made by the committee chair and the PO Box was inspected by a committee member. Each member of the committee signed for and accepted the mailed ballots. All ballots were loaded and transported to the counting area at our National Office. No person other than a committee member participated in any loading or unloading function. From the time the ballots entered the counting area no person outside of the committee had public access to the counting room. Observers were limited to members of the National Board, approved staff, NRLCA Legal Counsel, and outside vendors who were retained to provide certain services/and or equipment necessary to complete the ratification process. The door to the counting area was locked and all information was secured any time the committee members left the room. No person other than the chair was in possession of a key.
The committee began the duties associated with the ratification process on Monday January 30, 2007. All functions were completed Sunday February 4, 2007. The following constitutes the information compiled from the certification of the ballots.
On January 11, 2007 Eighty Six Thousand Four Hundred and Fifty Three, (86,453) ballots were mailed to all members in good standing.
Seventy-Eight (78) ballots were returned by the USPS as UAA/UTF (undeliverable as addressed/unable to forward). Thirteen (13) ballots were determined to be invalid and are not included in any count total.
Thirty Two Thousand Nine Hundred and Forty Five, (32945) ballots were processed. The results are:
NOTE: To further assure that every effort was made to present an accurate accounting of the voice of the membership a recount of the ballots was conducted
IN FAVOR OF RATIFICATION: 15,927
OPPOSED TO RATIFICATION: 16,932
VOID: 86
TOTAL BALLOTS: 32,945
The National Board will be contacting USPS Headquarters immediately in order to share the results of the ratification vote. Thereafter, the parties will discuss next steps, and the National Board will keep the membership apprised of important developments as they happen.
Check out the state by state results here!



February 6th, 2007 at 9:21 am
Wow, the Rural Carriers really stuck it to the man. Also, to their own Union leaders who negotiated with the man. I guess this means the Rural Carriers will be going to arbitration for a contract, just like the regular Carriers. If they win a good deal, the Clerks and Mail Handlers will look like chumps for settling. But if one or both Carrier Unions get screwed by a pro-management arbitrator, those settlements will start to look even better than they do now.
February 6th, 2007 at 11:19 am
wow, look at how greedy those rural carriers are becoming. Hope they convert routes to HCRs then.
February 6th, 2007 at 12:45 pm
OK, Good, Get together and fight. because the future for mail delivery name is HIGHWAY CONTRACTS. and your Union is allowing this to happen already.
USPS and your Union is allowing HIGHWAY CONTRACTS to grow big.
February 6th, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Pleez, Postal Clerk, no arbitrator is going to turn over substantial numbers of rural routes to highway contract routes; where is the HCR union that is going to pay for the arbitrator’s next meal? Our goofy negotiators were so outclassed they even agreed to a mail count in May if flats can be integrated into the DPS stream. Even you must know there is precious little mail at that time of year. And really, look at the numbers… they are pathetic by any standard you choose. It really is hard to imagine rurals faring worse in arbitration than in the rejected contract. Happily for those of us who opposed this contract, fewer that half bothered to return their ballots. I suspect the apathetic would have voted yes if you put a gun to their heads.
February 7th, 2007 at 1:55 pm
Wow, I am amazed that our rural union has not sold out like they do all the time especially the AZ unit that Moreland belongs to. Although he is not the pres., he sure acts like he is, when is this guy going to retire, I have been in the union for 12 years and this guy is a sell out from the day one. Just wonder how he gets benes in the back door from the USPS.
February 7th, 2007 at 8:26 pm
call in sick? fridays? hmmm…
February 8th, 2007 at 5:23 am
Our state and counties are going with a 3% pay raise. The minimum wage just went up 20%. Who wants to lock in a 1.2% raise for the next 4 years?
February 11th, 2007 at 7:40 am
alas we poor rural carriers. i personally only received 3to4 pay incresases per year during the last contract period. 2 colas per year ,1 yearly increase of 1.2% and 1or 2 step increases. meanwhile as missouri mailman points out minimum wage increases 20% (oh no thefirst increase in 20 or so years) or 3% for state and county workers (in nc state employees get an increase sporadically depending on the generosity of the legislature and they are rarely in a generous mood). luckily thanks to the last arbitration i lost 5 hours a week in evaluation thanks to the time value changes for mail pieces therefore i am doing the same amount of work for less pay. i do however believe that apathy did play a role in the defeat of the agreement. the non voters assumed that it would pass and the novoters knew that if they did not vote their voices wouldn’t be heard. there is always give and take in the contract negotiations. thats what negtioate means. hopefully we wont get bad a deal as we received in the last arbitration.
March 16th, 2007 at 10:27 am
good! I hope our union(and I use that term loosley)will see the light. they have been selling us down the road for as long as I can remember. from letting us lose all our sub time when we go regular to their pitiful attemps at negotiations. show up at negotiations,take your beating, and act like you have done me a favor. yeah right. I lost 8 years of sub time thinking that I could count my days worked toward my retirement. 27 years later they continue to pull the rug out from under us. file a grievence and maybe 4 years later you’ll get an decision. when you don’t have the power to strike you’re dead in the water and management knows this. we need teeth and we just don’t have it.