NALC’s Historic Contract Agreement Proposal
From NALC NEWS BULLETIN (February 1, 2007)
“The proposal delivers an all-regular workforce with weekends off as well as a significant reduction in the level of forced overtime. For the Postal Service, the proposal offers savings in the billions from reduced overtime and benefit costs in the future. However, it was offered only on the condition that the USPS give us new protections against contracting out and that it share its financial savings in the form of higher general wage increases.” — President Young.
Critical to any agreement would be a ban on USPS contracting out city delivery territory, the one issue that Young said prevented the parties from reaching agreement on a new contract.
Here are the key elements of NALC’s bargaining proposal for a new National Agreement
that would revolutionize city delivery work in the Postal Service:
A prohibition against contracting out any work within territory now served by
city delivery letter carriers, including in-fill development and natural additions to
existing routes.
Five-year contract, with annual wage increases and continued twice-a-year costof-
living adjustments.
A dramatic change in the health benefits whereby the Postal Service would pay 85
percent of premiums in the NALC Plan, and 72 percent in other Federal Employees
Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) plans. This proposal would result in substantial
savings to the Postal Service. Unlike the health benefit concessions recently
accepted by the three other postal unions, NALC’s proposal calls for letter carriers
to receive a share of these savings in the form of additional general wage increases.
In addition, the incentive to join the NALC Plan will allow the plan to be tailored to
the needs of letter carriers and to promote better health.
A major restructuring of the city carrier workforce: All letter carriers would
become full-time regulars with Monday-Friday schedules by the end of the contract.
Grade 2 carriers would be retained with revamped duties. All casuals and transitional
employees would be eliminated. A Saturday-only workforce of NALC-represented
bargaining unit carriers would be created. NALC and the Postal Service would
jointly approach OPM and, if necessary, Congress to secure regulatory or legislative
changes to ensure that retired letter carriers may be employed on Saturdays with
no dimunition of their annuities. New hires would be Step A and retirees Step 0.
Retirees would have preference for positions. Saturday new hires would have priority
for vacancies in Monday-Friday workforce. USPS would request from OPM authority
to offer an early-out. A task force would be created to implement the workforce
reorganization plan. Finally, the substantial savings to the Postal Service resulting
from this restructuring will be shared with all letter carriers in the form of general
wage increases.
If There is No Agreement
What happens if the Postal Service hierarchy turns its back on letter carriers and tosses away this golden opportunity to streamline its workforce for the future?
President Young explained that under the recently enacted postal reform legislation, the next step is a continuation of negotiations under the supervision of a mediator to be appointed by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. If that process does not result in an agreement, the final step is a referral of the impasse to an interest arbitration panel which will be authorized to hear the parties’ evidence and argument and issue a final and binding settlement.
In the meantime, pending future developments, President Young commended all NALC members for their patience and perseverance. He also urged members to continue to support existing cooperative programs such as Customer Connect and route evaluation and health and safety initiatives.



February 1st, 2007 at 9:08 pm
Young’s eyes must be brown!
February 4th, 2007 at 4:46 am
Give things a chance to be evaluated before such
harsh criticism. Too many of you sound like
management… please think before you speak!!!
February 6th, 2007 at 3:43 am
Weekends off? like a normal person? I will give up some OT (working N?S days) for that.
February 7th, 2007 at 5:23 pm
This was our union proposal to cut our health benefits from 85% to 72%? Any pay raise will end up going to health insurance unless you have NALC plan.Our union is forcing us to switch to NALC health plan. Is this legal???
February 11th, 2007 at 6:58 pm
I keep hearing that this is a “Done Deal” and they just need to work out the details.I have yet to see it on any official website.
February 14th, 2007 at 1:34 pm
yeah it’s a done deal, the NALC is giving ot to their members even worse than the apwu and npmhu have. Bend over rover and take it like a NEW postal worker… will the letter carriers join the rural carriers and turn down this garbage or since this is outside of negotitiations, it does not have to be ratified by the membership?
February 16th, 2007 at 12:40 pm
folks don’t seem to realize how serious the threat of contracting out is. wake up. as for health coverage, sooner or later unions in general are going to have to press seriously for national health insurance rather than fighting a rearguard action to preserve what’s left of our employer-funded benefits…a losing proposition with health care costs continuing to soar.
February 18th, 2007 at 4:50 pm
I will vote NO on any contract that tries to force me into the NALC health plan with lopsided premium rates. I will even go as far as to withdraw from the union and use the saved funds to pay for the increase in cost of the plan I prefer (if it is ratified). As a long time dues paying member I would abhor this option, and would only do so as a means of protest. Here’s something to think about: If something were to happen to the NALC health plan (bankruptcy, scandal, law suit, whatever)then we would be stuck paying the nearly doubled premium rates for the other plans until the contract ran out. Then it would be a horrendous (if not impossible) battle to restore our current benefits. Never put all of your eggs into one basket!
February 22nd, 2007 at 5:24 pm
everyone is telling me it is one line in the purposal that is stopping the go ahead?? I want to know what it is?? is it that bad where our union will give up early outs for the senior carriers?? to fight to keep it out? will arbatration keep it out?
March 6th, 2007 at 6:40 pm
I cannot believe the brainwashed idiots that comment here I will drop out of the Union if they vote this in. If you are threatening stuff like that you shouldn’t be in the union in the first place. Somehow you think it is all about you. Well idiot its not. Its about us together eat my shorts cry baby! DIAF!
March 22nd, 2007 at 4:29 pm
Anybody hear anything yet that is reliable about how the negotiations are doing,even if we have a date yet in front of a arbitrator?
March 24th, 2007 at 6:12 pm
Those of you so quick to criticize and “drop out of the union” probably just need to go ahead and do that - you are not a brother or sister anyway, just a “rider”. Sure you’ll all of the benefits, s/l, a/l, OT, no lay off, but support the NALC Health benefit Plan when you can save $10 a payday by belonging to the cheapest plan?
Bye, and in order to stick to your principles when you drop out, please make out a check to the charity or church of your choice for ALL increase in wages and benefits you receive during the term of this new contract.
I just want you to keep your pure conscience clean.
March 25th, 2007 at 6:07 am
Our union has been protecting the jobs of all Letter Carriers since it’s inception. I have seen many carriers saved through the efforts of many dedicated stewards. It seems to me that many of the people that would not support our Union and it’s binding decisions should not be mambers anyway, our union should protect members only and leave the scabs out to dry!
March 25th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
I think it is sheer lunacy this dream of retirees coming back to carry on Saturdays. I recently attended the National convention were the delegates voted on a Monday to Saturday delivery schedule. Not one word was spoken about this dramtic work style proposal. i have to believe people knew of it and did not tell the delegates about it. The lunacy of the plan is that none of the questions asked about it at the rap session could be addressed by President Young. The task force will answer all…. This is a pig in a poke and this plan cannot possibly work.
Do retirees sign up for life? What is the age cut off? Major metropolitan areas where gangs roam free, financially depressed areas, ghettos, what retiree will volunteer to go there? Who will be forced to go those areas on Saturday, the regular? The logistics will be a nightmare.
March 29th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
Having weekends off would make us a normal workforce. I think this is a good proposal. Saturdays can be done with parttimers and retirees. You’ll find that they’ll always have a shortage of manpower and people of the ot desire list will get to work on Saturdays. The rest of us want to enjoy our weekends off. Working Saturday sucked right along!!!
April 1st, 2007 at 4:10 am
Yes, It would be nice to have Saturdays off. The problem is the workforce that will have to deliver our routes on Saturday. I’ll get to pick up all the miss delivered dps mail on Monday. This is nothing but a ploy by the union to pick up alot more dues. A better idea is to just close on Saturdays. With volume dropping, we could use that volume during the week. It would help in an emvironment where management is continually trying to ad to our routes.
I also do not agree with the insurance issue. Many members have to go with another insurer because the NALC insurance has no providers in many areas. This would potentially hose those due paying members who cannot use the NALC plan. Screwing due paying members to help management does not sit well with me.
April 2nd, 2007 at 10:02 pm
In every negotiation you have to give to receive. If some of you want to let an arbitrator settle the contracting out issue you need only look back at the ones who allowed casuals and TE’s. I can say this about NALC health plan, who by the way was railroaded in raiseing their rates by OPM several years back, they are the only ins. carrier who has ever lowered rates. But if this is your only gripe and you have no concern about loss of deliveries by contracting out then you should find another job without a union as you are concerned yourself and not the future of your current job, because it would be only a matter of time when you are phased out.
Quit the union, interesting, but not an original idea, because you know you would still enjoy the benefits negotiated by the union. Those workers, have sponged off those who pay dues and believe in all for one, are called scabs or welfare carriers. Union is all about standing together for the improvement of all not one! Get a job at the local burger joint and spare us from you me only attitude!
If not for the Union you’d all be casuals.
April 3rd, 2007 at 10:56 am
Jesse, We belong to an Association not a Union. And they to often get in bed with management. And if you can’t understand that nearly half of carriers can’t use NALC insurance because it does not have providers (doctors enrolled for slow people like Jesse) in many areas, then Im not sure what else to say.
The union does not want to create a useless Saturdy workforce to help us out. They fully expect to double union enrollment which will not happen. Then we WILL have a scab work force trained and ready to step in for the next contract period. What do you think that means for us due paying members? To double our workforce with scabs!! Great idea Jesse!!
April 15th, 2007 at 9:18 pm
Fully expect to double???
Hello???…they were expecting some to ‘early out’ so that our T-6’s would have a position. The T-10!
That doesn’t mean more hiring.
As far as laying in bed with management…
One thing that I am so proud about our Union is that they see the big picture.
They know that the future of the post office is important…
While we may disagree with this or that…the proof lies in the fact that none of us are out there looking for a non union job.
I still feel ‘listened’ to.
July 3rd, 2007 at 8:37 pm
I’m a t-6 who is 9th on a seniority of about 40 carriers. If you think i will be bumped by a regular carrier who is 35th on the list, think again.Bumping will be by seniority and rebidding will take place.My position will not be redefined and be forced on me.
August 25th, 2007 at 8:57 am
Notice how the proposed agreement did not mention the Union’s or actually Bull Young’s capitulation on the no-layoff clause? That is a major give back that we now see but still to date have not heard about from NALC.
Also, see how bull young settled on health insurance from original proposal? Another give-back.
Also now that you have copies of proposed contract, take time to read the new memorandums beginning with page 114, the no layoff memo. You can see more NALC capitulation of issues of DOIS, the third bundle and the flat sorting machines.
Then there is the worst part of the agreement. The elimination of casuals and in their place Transitional employees. Plus an additional 8,000 TEs. Nice going Bull, help your buddies in management do away with our jobs.
Please, for the members sake Bull, retire after this term as you promised us you would. We cannot afford any more of your historic agreements.