Retired Postal Employees to Perform Retail Services
According to APWU President William Burrus in the Jan./Feb.2007 issue of the “American Postal Worker” Magazine:
Perhaps the most innovative aspect of the agreement is the memorandum committing the parties to develop rules and procedures for the employment of retired postal employees to perform retail services. These employees will be hired by and paid by the American Postal Workers Union, and contracted to the Postal Service. If successful this program will present an opportunity to expand retail services to locations where it is not cost-effective to open a full-service facility.
Thousands of contract stations where postal services are treated as an afterthought could be converted to official USPS facilities; these facilities could expand our outreach into commercial venues with heavy consumer traffic.
Of course, care must be taken to ensure that these new retail opportunities do not distract from official retail sites and that our career employees are not adversely affected. But this bold move provides the union and management the opportunity to form a beneficial partnership that also expands services for the American public.
The Memorandum of Understanding between USPS and APWU states:
Re: Retail Associate
The parties agree to convene a national task force to establish rules and procedures for the utilization of supplemental retail sales and associates. The Task Force will include consideration of a process by which the Union may provide lists of prospective workers to perform retail duties in locations identified by the parties. Such workers will not be a part of a supplemental workforce under Article 7. The meetings will begin no later than February 1, 2007 and will be concluded by May 1, 2007.
It is interesting to note that during negotiations for the contract extension in 2005, USPS and APWU explored the creation of Retail Sales Assistants “who would work in grocery stores, malls, and other venues that are easily accessible to the public. These positions would be reserved for retired postal employees, who would continue to draw their retirement annuities.”
“But union and management representatives were notified by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) that such an arrangement could not be approved.”
However, last year, OPM issued regulations to amend the criteria under which OPM may grant dual compensation (salary off-set) waivers on a case-by-case basis, or delegate waiver authority to agencies. The amemded regulations would allow retired workers to return to the federal government without a paycut. OPM Proposes Rule Change to Re-Employ Retirees Without Pay Cut



January 17th, 2007 at 9:07 am
looks like the end of my 21 year window career.
I’ll end up on tour one on the bar coder
January 17th, 2007 at 6:30 pm
Just another example of the APWU selling out its workers instead of fighting for permanent positions, yes, with benefits. Love how your membership is all for it. Makes me glad I’m a carrier.
January 17th, 2007 at 7:35 pm
This union is going to screw over everyone, time to get the hell out of this union!!!!!!!!!!!
January 17th, 2007 at 8:04 pm
Did you even read the article Jim? Unless you work at a drug store counter where you do mail services on the side, this will not affect you.
If it was up to me, I would replace BOTH “mailman” and “ET” with low wage no benefits illegals… oh wait, “W” is already implementing that plan. And whatever you two do, please DON’T ever give to COPA as I don’t want to slow “W”’s roll…
Me? I am going to work part time delivering pizzas and MAIL. Yes pizza and MAIL, the Carriers Union is even more worthless for protecting full time jobs as you “mailman”, claim the APWU to be.
January 17th, 2007 at 10:58 pm
Oh my gawd…no way. After dealing with these employees for 30 years, now the USPS wants to knowingly engage in a business agreeement with the very same union that fights to keep crappy employees working for postal?
Hopefully OPM won’t allow this. Why should they allow an employee to double dip. Send ‘em to WalMart to greet.
January 18th, 2007 at 10:53 am
Hey Alex, are you a stuporvisor?
If so, vengeance is mine my friend…
hee-hee…
January 18th, 2007 at 4:27 pm
Our contract is going to arbitration over the very issue that the apwu endorsed and from what I’ve read so far what a lot of clerk retirees want. No union is perfect but at least we don’t eat our young. You’re spineless and greedy with no regard to future generations. You perpetuate Bush’s goal to turn the American worker into Chinamen who work until they die with no benefits just as long as you get your lousy 10 bucks an hour as a retired part timer. You don’t have and don’t deserve a union.
January 18th, 2007 at 4:29 pm
I am a PTF in an AO under 200 man hours and a window clerk, do i look that good to Burras that he wants to screw me twice???
January 19th, 2007 at 1:29 pm
Actually I was trying to be sarcastic with my Bush comments.
Apparently I failed in my attempt to frame the retired stamp seller positions as a minor issue against the much larger backdrop of our whole country literally being sold down the Yangtze River. At least I think we agree on that point.
February 9th, 2007 at 12:12 pm
where can I get an application
March 17th, 2007 at 12:43 pm
I’m confused, did any of you read this word for word? if I retire and want to earn more money I can, get a job in another field, get lucky and win a lotto, ebay, get a job in a field I know and have been working in. I’m volunteering to work, part time, for my benefit, doing something I am comfortable with at a descent wage. I would prefer not to greet at wal-mart or deliver pizzas.
April 5th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
Mixed feelings about this….Just more fuel for the fire to cut jobs rather than make jobs………………. On the other hand, better for our clerk craft retirees rather than having Management or carriers or PMRs doing our work. Not to mention the knowledge and advise we can gain from our fellow clerk craft retirees…. lets weigh the good and the bad
April 9th, 2007 at 4:42 pm
Does this apply only to retired window clerks or are all employees included?
September 13th, 2007 at 5:20 pm
evidently bush and the union are on the same side when it comes to illegal aliens.
November 24th, 2007 at 7:42 pm
What are any of you talking about? Retirees—freakin’ retire!!! let the younger people get a job, you did your time. Every job you take, takes one away from people with families and children. You did your time, you can’t take it with you. Get a hobby and finally out of the workforce. Selfish Bstards.