Postmaster Alleges Under-staffing, Workload Caused Stress in Retirement Case
Postmaster Marilyn Musser applied for a disability retirement annuity asserting that a “major depressive disorder, family and marital stress, extreme anxiety and difficulty with concentration, retention, and recall” prevented her from performing her duties as a Postmaster with the Postal Service.The Postmaster also testified that anxiety and stress caused by her increased workload and alleged under-staffing by the Postal Service caused her to become absent from work.
In its final decision, OPM denied Musser’s application, finding that her statement, supervisor’s statement, and medical evidence “did not constitute objective evidence that her conditions had worsened significantly and caused disablement. OPM also found that the evidence submitted did not demonstrate that her conditions caused any documented service deficiencies.”
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) petitioned for review of the initial decision issued on December 15, 2004, that reversed OPM’s denial of the appellant’s application for disability retirement benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). Upon re-hearing MSPB reversed its initial decision, and sustained OPM’s denial of the appellant’s application for disability retirement benefits. The MSPB ruled the evidence presented by Musser ”does not unambiguously and without contradiction indicate that the appellant’s medical condition prevents her from performing her specific work requirements.”
Marilyn Joyce Musser v. Office of Personnel Management



May 12th, 2006 at 9:38 am
The Postmaster represented herself without an attorney and did a good job. However, this is a Catch-22.
By doing so well in representing herself, she probably undermined her contention that she was too disabled to work.
Where the disability is not obvious, it is wise to hire a qualified representative.
May 18th, 2006 at 2:05 pm
IMy husband may retire on disability and he was told to get an attorney. It is always wise to have good representation when going up against the big guys. Good advice steward.
June 14th, 2006 at 6:06 pm
Isn’t there a saying about those who represent themselves, having a fool for a client. It’s not just a cute saying.
August 14th, 2006 at 9:32 am
If the system provides you with an expert, pay a little bit now, and not a lot latter.
October 26th, 2006 at 5:24 am
Steward and SunUp you are ABSOLUTELY right.
It’s foolish to file a disability claim without the help of an attorney. Disability retirement is not just a TEMPORARILY OWCP or Workers Comp case. There is too much in stage. In cases where you are completely paralyzed or need to stay in bed for the rest of your life, you probably wouldn’t need an attorney.
However, for other cases where the disability is not so clear-cut, you will need to hire a lawyer. This is especially truth for cases such as chemical allergies or depression, where the disability is more difficult to prove. I am a former Postal Worker and I hired attorney Robert R. McGill (website: http://federaldisabilitylawyer.com/ ) a year ago, and he did an excellent job for me. I won my case in the first “round”. The first check I received from the OPM more than cover the legal cost associated with hiring a lawyer (well it was like a check for four previous months).
I know each person has a different case, and there are many restrictions about when or how long a person has to file a disability claim, that’s why is important to at least talk with an attorney, usually the first consultation is free. So why taking chances?