|
|
||
|
Home| Postal News | Your Rights | Editorials | Links | About | Sitemap | Search| Editor |
||
|
|
||
|
Court of Appeals Keeps Alive 14-Year-Old Lawsuit Against NALC |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Letter Carrier David Noble filed a lawsuit against NALC President William H. Young, President Emeritus Vincent R. Sombrotto, and 10 other former NALC officers. The suit, filed in February,1994 alleged that the officers breached their fiduciary duties under federal law by accepting in-town expenses, convention per diem payments, and FICA reimbursements. On September 30, 2005 the District Court found in favor of the officers and the Union on all issues. However, on May 16, 2008 the DC Court of Appeals reversed in part and vacated in part where: 1) plaintiff presented sufficient circumstantial evidence of misuse of reimbursements for union related activities; 2) there was a question as to whether defendants used their allowances for personal benefit rather than on legitimate union expenses; and 3) there was no factual basis for a mootness determination regarding a section 201(c) claim for release of documents. According to the court decision:
The other interesting part of this opinion are the comments found at the bottom of page 45. Here is what it says:
note: I was totally stunned by these biased comments. Check out the case Noble vs Sombrotto
|
||
Copyright © 2001-present PostalReporter.com]. All rights reserved